Launched in January 2018, the Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP) seeks to rapidly and effectively improve 112 of the country’s most underdeveloped districts. The programme is built around three key pillars: Convergence (aligning Central and State schemes), Collaboration (engaging Central, State-level Nodal Officers, and District Collectors), and fostering Competition among districts through monthly delta rankings, all supported by a mass movement.
The ADP works by implementing projects that address the challenges in one of its five core target themes: Health & Nutrition, Education, Agriculture & Water Resources, Financial Inclusion & Skill Development, and Infrastructure. The projects can be either innovative policy practices or replication of best-practices and use of consolidated advanced technologies. District administrations and Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE) have to submit their projects to NITI Aayog’s Project Management Unit, who will support them in shaping the plans to effectively leverage socio-economic and human development.
Next to the preparation phase, NITI Empowered Committee evaluates the projects assessing if they have the potential to improve development indicators and if they are aligned with the Economic Action Plan for Sustainable Development Goals (EAP-SDG). In the case of CPSEs projects, CPSEs’ boards also have to provide necessary approvals. After the project is approved, it is implemented by its proposer and the monitoring is undertaken by the Department of Public Enterprise and by NITI Aayog.
With States playing a leading role, the initiative emphasizes leveraging each district’s strengths, targeting easily achievable goals for quick progress, and tracking advancement through monthly rankings. Districts are ranked based on their improvement across 49 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) grouped under the five major socio-economic themes. The monthly delta rankings and district performances are published on the Champions of Change Dashboard.
ADP has a great focus on overcoming hunger and malnutrition. Thus, among its KPIs monitored for improvement, there are: “Percentage of underweight children under 6 years”, “Percentage of Severe Acute Malnourishment (SAM) in children under 6 years to total children under 6 years”, “Percentage of Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) in children under 6 years to total children under 6 years”, “Percentage of pregnant women regularly taking Supplementary Nutrition under the ICDS programme”, “Percentage of newborns breastfed within one hour of birth”, and “Percentage of low birth weight babies (less than 2500g)”.
The ADP focuses on inclusive development, considering specific needs of:
- Women: Promoting gender equality and women's health.
- Children: Prioritizing nutrition and education of children
- Youth: Fostering educational and employment opportunities.
- Marginalized Populations: Recognizing unique cultural and socio-economic needs and historic marginalisation.
- Population of hard-to-reach areas: Recognizing challenges of hilly terrains, landlocked and hard- to- reach areas.
112 of India’s 739 districts, spread across the country, focusing on the most underdeveloped.
As the main strategy of the Aspirational Districts Programme is based on convergence of existing schemes which have their own funding arrangement, large infusion of funds has not been envisaged. However, in order to foster competitive spirit, and for addressing critical gaps, additional allocation based on challenge method has been provisioned. Every month, districts are assessed on the basis of monthly progress on key indicators and the best performing Districts in overall terms and in each of the five socio-economic themes are awarded. Based on the performance under the Challenge Method, the districts propose projects which are then approved by an Empowered Committee consisting of Secretaries of central line ministries chaired by CEO, NITI Aayog.
ADP involves multi-sectoral governance with a decentralized approach, engaging local communities and development sector organizations. Compared to the traditional top-down method, the ADP encourages active collaboration across different levels of governance within each Aspirational District, along with promoting public-private partnerships. This stakeholder-focused model is built on a shared understanding among partners and relies on a common framework of outcome-based metrics and data.
ADP has a robust monitoring system under which the districts report administrative data on 49 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as per their periodicity every month. The Monthly Performance Reports (MPRs) are sent to the districts every month. The data is available to districts and public on the 'Champions of Change' dashboard
Evidence base The ADP is supported by national and international literature that demonstrates the positive impact of targeted interventions on hunger and poverty. A sample of evaluations and assesments are:
An Assessment of Aspirational Districts Programme. Institute for Competitiveness Authors:. Michael Green and Dr. Amit Kapoor.
Foreword by Michael E. Porter (Professor, Harvard Business School) and Scott Stern (Professor, MIT): “Though still at an early stage, the findings are highly encouraging. Almost all districts included in the ADP program have made progress on key development parameters as compared to the baseline, and are performing significantly better today than they were before the programme was initiated. Particularly notable are gains in Health and Wellness, and Basic Infrastructure. The ADP seems to not have simply maintained the districts along a pre-existing trajectory but materially improved the rate of improvement.”
Stories of Change From India’s Aspirational Districts: Use of behavioural insights. Centre for Social and Behaviour Change, Ashoka University, India.
Foreword by Dr. Rajiv Kumar (Vice Chairman, NITI Aayog): “The ADP marks a shift from ficating on economic progress to achieving meaningful social advancement, a concern that is more salient today, during a global pandemic, than it has ever been before. The programme rests on pillars of inclusivity and development for all, which are indubitably admirable goals. Thus, an approach that takes into account India’s diversity along a number of axes and brings together insights from a variety of disciplines is crucial for the success of the ADP. To this end, the importance of behavioural science-based solutions to the Programme cannot be overstated.”
Aspirational Districts Programme: An Appraisal. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP India 2020, authored by Khasnobis et al.).
“What gets measured gets done: In addition to the 3Cs approach, the study also found that the ADP’s focus on constant real-time monitoring and data driven decision-making has been a chief contributor to better governance. This has especially helped district administrations in identifying the strengths or weaknesses of a district, resulting in more strategic and informed approaches for development.
Aspirational districts versus non-aspirational districts: Based on the interviews with different stakeholders, it was found that one of the chief advantages of the ADP is that it has given attention to districts otherwise neglected due to their lower performances. This aspect has aided most districts to demand the necessary support required for their districts.
Effectiveness of the ADP: This evaluation found that a key feature that sets the ADP apart from other development programmes is the clear and comprehensive framework it provides to the districts. This framework has provided effective guidance for districts to focus their efforts on achieving the targets of the programme. In fact, the framework is an effective method of ensuring that efforts are synchronised with the wider goals of the country and are not arbitrary in nature.”
Deep Dive: Insights from Champions of Change - The Aspirational Districts Dashboard National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog (June, 2018).
“States have worked hard in the last two months to improve the socio-economic status of their aspirational districts. Telangana, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu have shown the maximum progress, while Jammu & Kashmir, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh have to work harder.”
Dahod, Gujarat was the district that improved the most in the first compilation of delta ranking (increased 19.8 points), while the result was also positive for the district that improved the least: Kupwara, Jammu & Kashmir with 0.5 point increase.
Aspirational Districts: Unlocking Potentials. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog (2018).
This is a report that details out how the ADP was designed. Most importantly, in chapter six and seven, they describe the arrangements put forth towards evidence-based decision making in the districts, including validation of data through household surveys.
Lessons from ADP include:
1. The importance of a data-driven approach for effective monitoring.
2. The need for stakeholder collaboration at all levels of governance.
3. The value of flexibility and adaptability to address district-specific challenges.
4. The critical role of Jan Andolan (community engagement) for successful implementation.
5. The value of peer learning through best practices.
NITI Aayog is primarily the knowledge institution involved in monitoring, research and evaluation of ADP and coordinates with all central line ministries and state administrations. NITI Aayog is the premier think- tank of Government of India.
SDG 1 - No poverty
- Target 1.3 - Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
- Indicator 1.3.1 - Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable.
SDG 2 - Zero hunger
- Target 2.1 - By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round.
- Indicator 2.1.1 - Prevalence of undernourishment
- Indicator 2.1.2 - Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)
- Target 2.2 - By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons.
- Indicator 2.2.1 - Prevalence of stunting (height for age <-2 standard deviation from the median of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age
- Indicator 2.2.2 - Prevalence of malnutrition (weight for height >+2 or <-2 standard deviation from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age, by type (wasting and overweight)
- Indicator 2.2.3 - Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15 to 49 years, by pregnancy status (percentage)
SDG 3 Good Health and Wellbeing
- Target 3.1 - By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births
- Indicator 3.1.1 - Maternal mortality ratio
- Indicator 3.1.2 -Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel
- Target 3.2 By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births
- Indicator 3.2.1 - Under-5 mortality rate
- Indicator 3.2.2 - Neonatal mortality rate
- Target 3.8 - Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all
- Indicator 3.8.1 - Coverage of essential health services (defined as the average coverage of essential services based on tracer interventions that include reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non communicable diseases and service capacity and access, among the general and the most disadvantaged population)
SDG 4 - Quality Education
- Target 4.6 - By 2030, ensure that all youth and a substantial proportion of adults, both men and women, achieve literacy and numeracy.
- Indicator 4.6.1 - Proportion of population in a given age group achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional (a) literacy and (b) numeracy skills, by sex.
- Target 4.a - Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all.
- Indicator 4.a.1 -Proportion of schools with access to (a) electricity; (b) the Internet for pedagogical purposes; (c) computers for pedagogical purposes; (d) adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities; (e) basic drinking water; (f) single-sex basic sanitation facilities; and (g) basic handwashing facilities (as per the WASH indicator definitions)
- Target 4.c - By 2030, substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers, including through international cooperation for teacher training in developing countries, especially least developed countries and small island developing States.
- Indicator 4.c.1 - Proportion of teachers in (a) pre-primary; (b) primary; (c) lower secondary; and (d) upper secondary education who have received at least the minimum organized teacher training (e.g. pedagogical training) pre-service or in service required for teaching at the relevant level in a given country.
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
- Target 7.1 - By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services.
- Indicator 7.1.1 -Proportion of population with access to electricity
SDG 11 - Sustainable cities and communities
- Target 11.1 - By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums.
- Indicator 11.1.1 - Proportion of urban population living in slums, informal settlements or inadequate housing.
SDG 1 – No poverty
- Target 1.3 – Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
- Indicator 1.3.1 – Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing children, unemployed persons, older persons, persons with disabilities, pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims and the poor and the vulnerable.
SDG 2 – Zero hunger
- Target 2.1 – By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round.
- Indicator 2.1.1 – Prevalence of undernourishment
- Indicator 2.1.2 – Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)
- Target 2.2 – By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons.
- Indicator 2.2.1 – Prevalence of stunting (height for age <-2 standard deviation from the median of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age
- Indicator 2.2.2 – Prevalence of malnutrition (weight for height >+2 or <-2 standard deviation from the median of the WHO Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age, by type (wasting and overweight)
- Indicator 2.2.3 – Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15 to 49 years, by pregnancy status (percentage)
SDG 3 Good Health and Wellbeing
- Target 3.1 – By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births
- Indicator 3.1.1 – Maternal mortality ratio
- Indicator 3.1.2 –Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel
- Target 3.2 By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births
- Indicator 3.2.1 – Under-5 mortality rate
- Indicator 3.2.2 – Neonatal mortality rate
- Target 3.8 – Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all
- Indicator 3.8.1 – Coverage of essential health services (defined as the average coverage of essential services based on tracer interventions that include reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, infectious diseases, non communicable diseases and service capacity and access, among the general and the most disadvantaged population)
SDG 4 – Quality Education
- Target 4.6 – By 2030, ensure that all youth and a substantial proportion of adults, both men and women, achieve literacy and numeracy.
- Indicator 4.6.1 – Proportion of population in a given age group achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional (a) literacy and (b) numeracy skills, by sex.
- Target 4.a – Build and upgrade education facilities that are child, disability and gender sensitive and provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all.
- Indicator 4.a.1 –Proportion of schools with access to (a) electricity; (b) the Internet for pedagogical purposes; (c) computers for pedagogical purposes; (d) adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities; (e) basic drinking water; (f) single-sex basic sanitation facilities; and (g) basic handwashing facilities (as per the WASH indicator definitions)
- Target 4.c – By 2030, substantially increase the supply of qualified teachers, including through international cooperation for teacher training in developing countries, especially least developed countries and small island developing States.
- Indicator 4.c.1 – Proportion of teachers in (a) pre-primary; (b) primary; (c) lower secondary; and (d) upper secondary education who have received at least the minimum organized teacher training (e.g. pedagogical training) pre-service or in service required for teaching at the relevant level in a given country.
SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy
- Target 7.1 – By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services.
- Indicator 7.1.1 –Proportion of population with access to electricity
SDG 11 – Sustainable cities and communities
- Target 11.1 – By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums.
- Indicator 11.1.1 – Proportion of urban population living in slums, informal settlements or inadequate housing.
Launched in January 2018, the Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP) seeks to rapidly and effectively improve 112 of the country’s most underdeveloped districts. The programme is built around three key pillars: Convergence (aligning Central and State schemes), Collaboration (engaging Central, State-level Nodal Officers, and District Collectors), and fostering Competition among districts through monthly delta rankings, all supported by a mass movement.
The ADP works by implementing projects that address the challenges in one of its five core target themes: Health & Nutrition, Education, Agriculture & Water Resources, Financial Inclusion & Skill Development, and Infrastructure. The projects can be either innovative policy practices or replication of best-practices and use of consolidated advanced technologies. District administrations and Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE) have to submit their projects to NITI Aayog’s Project Management Unit, who will support them in shaping the plans to effectively leverage socio-economic and human development.
Next to the preparation phase, NITI Empowered Committee evaluates the projects assessing if they have the potential to improve development indicators and if they are aligned with the Economic Action Plan for Sustainable Development Goals (EAP-SDG). In the case of CPSEs projects, CPSEs’ boards also have to provide necessary approvals. After the project is approved, it is implemented by its proposer and the monitoring is undertaken by the Department of Public Enterprise and by NITI Aayog.
With States playing a leading role, the initiative emphasizes leveraging each district’s strengths, targeting easily achievable goals for quick progress, and tracking advancement through monthly rankings. Districts are ranked based on their improvement across 49 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) grouped under the five major socio-economic themes. The monthly delta rankings and district performances are published on the Champions of Change Dashboard.
ADP has a great focus on overcoming hunger and malnutrition. Thus, among its KPIs monitored for improvement, there are: “Percentage of underweight children under 6 years”, “Percentage of Severe Acute Malnourishment (SAM) in children under 6 years to total children under 6 years”, “Percentage of Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) in children under 6 years to total children under 6 years”, “Percentage of pregnant women regularly taking Supplementary Nutrition under the ICDS programme”, “Percentage of newborns breastfed within one hour of birth”, and “Percentage of low birth weight babies (less than 2500g)”.
The ADP focuses on inclusive development, considering specific needs of:
- Women: Promoting gender equality and women’s health.
- Children: Prioritizing nutrition and education of children
- Youth: Fostering educational and employment opportunities.
- Marginalized Populations: Recognizing unique cultural and socio-economic needs and historic marginalisation.
- Population of hard-to-reach areas: Recognizing challenges of hilly terrains, landlocked and hard- to- reach areas.
Lessons from ADP include:
1. The importance of a data-driven approach for effective monitoring.
2. The need for stakeholder collaboration at all levels of governance.
3. The value of flexibility and adaptability to address district-specific challenges.
4. The critical role of Jan Andolan (community engagement) for successful implementation.
5. The value of peer learning through best practices.
Integrated programmes for human capital development, including health and education and early childhood development; Integrated programmes for gender equality and empowerment
NITI Aayog is primarily the knowledge institution involved in monitoring, research and evaluation of ADP and coordinates with all central line ministries and state administrations. NITI Aayog is the premier think- tank of Government of India.
ADP involves multi-sectoral governance with a decentralized approach, engaging local communities and development sector organizations. Compared to the traditional top-down method, the ADP encourages active collaboration across different levels of governance within each Aspirational District, along with promoting public-private partnerships. This stakeholder-focused model is built on a shared understanding among partners and relies on a common framework of outcome-based metrics and data.
112 of India’s 739 districts, spread across the country, focusing on the most underdeveloped.
As the main strategy of the Aspirational Districts Programme is based on convergence of existing schemes which have their own funding arrangement, large infusion of funds has not been envisaged. However, in order to foster competitive spirit, and for addressing critical gaps, additional allocation based on challenge method has been provisioned. Every month, districts are assessed on the basis of monthly progress on key indicators and the best performing Districts in overall terms and in each of the five socio-economic themes are awarded. Based on the performance under the Challenge Method, the districts propose projects which are then approved by an Empowered Committee consisting of Secretaries of central line ministries chaired by CEO, NITI Aayog.
ADP has a robust monitoring system under which the districts report administrative data on 49 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as per their periodicity every month. The Monthly Performance Reports (MPRs) are sent to the districts every month. The data is available to districts and public on the ‘Champions of Change’ dashboard