Policy Instrument:
Definition
This Policy Instrument typically involves the transfer/supply of non-perishable food items to meet both specific quantity and quality standards, ideally incorporating fortified foods in emergency and humanitarian contexts. It should not be a single food item-based ration but a mixed ration, which may include a balanced combination of one or more staple foods, pulses, vegetable oil, salt. Food items may be procured from within the country, including from smallholder farmers, which can in turn also support livelihoods and boost the local economy.
Rationale
Emergency food transfers/supply provide rapid access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food during crises - helping prevent hunger, malnutrition, and negative coping strategies among affected populations.
Key features
- Social protection systems including coordination platforms, targeting and beneficiary management systems, workforce, delivery mechanisms, etc can help to rapidly and adequately reach large segments of the vulnerable population, providing support at scale. When feasible and appropriate, social protection systems can be leveraged by international humanitarian actors to provide emergency food transfers to crisis affected populations.
- Successful delivery of emergency food transfers—whether for one-off rapid-onset shocks or longer seasonal stresses—requires pre-agreed plans and effective logistics, which might include pre-positioning stocks, planning timely distribution, ensuring food safety and quality, and maximising the nutritional benefit.
- Emergency food transfers have the potential to be integrated with anticipatory action approaches, so that assistance can be released predictably and rapidly when an agreed trigger-point is reached and before the disaster fully hits.
- Also, in complex emergencies and fragile contexts great care must be taken to ensure that food transfers are “conflict sensitive” and specifically tailored to the contexts in which they are delivered to avoid exacerbating conflict or tensions.
- Emergency food transfers, whether for short term relief or in response to seasonal stresses are unlikely to meet the nutritional needs of all members of households, specifically pregnant and breastfeeding women and children under five years of age. A complementary and nutritious food supplement, cash top-up, or vouchers provided directly to women and children, will be needed particularly in contexts of high food insecurity in order to prevent malnutrition.
Targeting mechanisms
- For short-term relief following sudden disasters such as typhoons or floods, food assistance may be distributed to people registered as having been affected (e.g. those displaced to emergency shelters) or living in geographical areas identified as affected. For assistance in the light of seasonal stresses, e.g. during the lean season, food items may be distributed to households in areas where the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) level, ideally triangulated with malnutrition information, or the Cadre Harmonisé (where relevant) or equivalent, exceeds a certain threshold, with assistance targeted at those deemed most in need by the community or other targeting method.
Links with other policy instruments
- Food transfers may be preferred to cash transfers in contexts where markets are disrupted or where food prices are high or volatile and/or experiencing high inflation. Under such conditions, the capacity of food transfers to keep purchasing power constant can be an advantage. They may also be combined with cash assistance for non-food needs, or sequenced so that those assisted receive cash assistance subsequently once markets are re-established.
Households at risk of food insecurity and malnutrition owing to shocks which are typically large-scale, and often related to:
- Climate (one-off, seasonal or cyclical shocks including drought, typhoons etc.);
- Armed conflict;
- Forced displacement;
- Macroeconomic conditions (like food price inflation)
The Policy Instrument may be geographically targeted to populations in areas of the country identified as experiencing high levels of food insecurity and malnutrition, and/or to households whose members such as:
- Young children;
- Pregnant and lactating women;
- Elderly;
- People living with disabilities, and chronic diseases (such as HIV);
- People who have economic or social characteristics that expose them to a greater risk of hunger and malnutrition;
- People who need to meet their immediate food needs in a crisis.
Just like with any Policy Instrument, there may be a few risks associated with the use of food transfers in emergency responses.
- There may be risks around food safety and quality, including the expiry of stocks being held for contingency purposes. A risk management measure in this regard could be to ensure that pre-positioned stocks are regularly monitored so that expired food items can be replaced in a timely manner.
- There may be a risk that households with individuals most at risk of malnutrition are not adequately reached with emergency food transfers. To redress this risk, nutrition considerations need to be integral to targeting and need assessment processes so that design of transfers systematically consider nutrition. In practice this may mean complementing the household food transfer with additional support targeted to at-risk individuals, such as pregnant and breastfeeding women and girls and children under five.
- Another potential risk is that food distributed does not match people's preferences or most urgent needs in an emergency, which can result in food items being traded rather than consumed. Here, consultations with communities to understand their needs and priorities are critical and need to be conducted as part of preparedness measures ahead of emergencies. This is especially relevant in contexts of recurrent crises.
- In complex emergencies and fragile contexts, transferring food, but also other in-kind items, or delivering cash assistance to affected populations may inadvertently raise risks to those receiving assistance or to the fragile political and security dynamics. It is important that, just like with any other transfer modality, emergency food transfers are based on solid context analysis to anticipate and mitigate protection and conflict sensitivity risks.
SDG 3 - Good health and well-being
- Target 3.1 - Maternal mortality: By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 per 100,000 live births.
- Target 3.2 - Neonatal and child mortality: By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Sustainable Development Goals
- CFS Voluntary Guidelines on Food Systems and Nutrition (VGFSyN)
- Paris Agreement for Climate Change